制度质量与技术创新——基于中国1997~2009年制造业数据的分析Institutional Quality and Technological Innovation:Based on Analysis of Chinese Manufacture from 1997~2009
杨飞
摘要(Abstract):
制度质量会影响新技术的研发和应用,进而对经济增长产生影响。本文采用我国1997~2009年数据研究了制度质量对高技术产业和中等技术制造业技术创新的影响。运用2SLS法估计表明,总体制度质量、产权保护、金融市场化和政府与市场的关系对制造业技术创新有显著的正向影响。吸引外资程度对整体高技术产业技术创新影响不显著,而且对中等技术制造业和外资高技术产业技术创新有显著的负向影响。制度质量对国企高技术产业技术创新影响不显著。此外,产权保护不会限制高技术产业技术外溢对技术创新的影响,但对中等技术制造业的技术外溢形成约束。
关键词(KeyWords): 制度质量;技术创新;制造业;技术水平;产权
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题“全球金融危机对我国产业转移和产业升级的影响及对策研究”(项目编号:09JZD0018)的资助
作者(Author): 杨飞
DOI: 10.13269/j.cnki.ier.2013.05.008
参考文献(References):
- [1]Acemoglu,Daron,Simon Johnson,James A.,Robinson,2001,“The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development:An Empirical Investigation”,American Economic Review,91(5):1369—1401.
- [2]Acemoglu,Daron,Simon Johnson,James A.,Robinson,2002,“Reversal of Fortune:Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution”,Quarterly Journal of Economics,117(4):1231—1294.
- [3]North,Douglass,2009,Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- [4]Aghion,Philippe,and Peter Howitt,2009,The Economics of Growth,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
- [5]熊彼特.资本主义、社会主义与民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
- [6]Tebaldi,Edinaldo and Bruce Elmslie,2008,“Institutions,Innovation And Economic Growth”,Journal of Economic Development,Chung-Ang Unviersity,Department of Economics,33(2):27—53.
- [7]Tebaldi,Edinaldo and Bruce Elmslie,2013,“Does institutional quality impact innovation?Evidence from cross-country patent grant data”,Applied Economics,Taylor and Francis Journals,45(7):887—900.
- [8]刘伟,张辉.中国经济增长中的产业结构变迁和技术进步经济研究[J].2008(11):4—15.
- [9]La Porta,Rafael,Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes,and Andrei Shleifer,2008,“The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins”,Journal of Economic Literature,46(2):285—332.
- [10]Acemoglu,Daron,2006,“A Simple Model of Inefficient Institutions”,Scandinavian Journal of Economics,108(4):515—546.
- [11]Helpman,Elhanan,1993,“Innovation,Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights”,Econometrica,61:1247—1280.
- [12]Falvey,Rod,Neil,Foster and Olga Memedovic,2006,The Role of Intellectual Prop-erty Rights in Technology Transfer and Economic Growth:Theory and Evidence,UNIDO Working Papers,Vienna.
- [13]Joseph,P.H.,Fan,Stuart,L.,Gillan,and Xin Yu,2010,“Innovation or Imitation?The Role of Intellectual Property Rights Protections[EB/OL],http://ihome.cuhk.edu.hk/~b109671/doc/research_woking_paper/11.pdf.
- [14]Shleifer,Andrei,1998,State Versus Private Ownership.,NBER Working Paper No.6665.
- [15]Huang,Haizhou and Chenggang Xu,1999,“Institutions,Innovations and Growth”,American Economic Review,89(2):438—443.
- [16]侯晓辉,王青,冯宗宪.金融生态与中国工业企业的技术创新能力[J].产业经济研究,2012(3):59—79.
- [17]张中元,赵国庆.FDI、环境规制与技术进步—基于中国省级数据的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012(4):19—32.
- [18]逯东,林高,杨丹.政府补助、研发支出与市场价值[J].投资研究,2012(9):67—81.
- [19]Acemoglu,Daron,2002,“Directed Technical Change”,Review of Economic Studies,69:781—809.
- [20]Jaffe,Adam,B.,Trajtenberg,Manuel,&Henderson,Rebecca,1993,“Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations”,Quarterly Journal of Economics,108(3):577—598.
- [21]Hanlon,Walker,2012,Necessity is the Mother of Invention:Input Supplies and Directed Technical Change[EB/OL],http://www.columbia.edu.sixxs.org/~wwh2104/hanlon_dtc.pdf,Job Market Paper.
- [22]樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数:各地区市场化相对进程2011年报告[R].北京:经济科学出版社,2011.
- [23]Levine,Ross,2005,“Finance and Growth:Theory and Evidence”,Handbook of Economic Growth,in:Philippe Aghion&Steven Durlauf(ed.),Handbook of Economic Growth,edition 1,volume 1,chapter 12,pages 865—934.
- [24]刘小鲁.我国创新能力积累的主要途径:R&D,技术引进,还是FDI?[J].经济评论,2011(3):88—96.
- [25]余泳泽.FDI技术外溢是否存在“门槛条件”—来自我国高技术产业的面板门限回归分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012(8):49—63.
- [26]Coyne,Christopher,J.,and Russell S.Sobel,How Are Institutions Related?,Economic Freedom of the World:2010Annual Report.
- [27]Ayyagari,M.,Demirguc-Kunt,A.and V.Maksimovic,2008,Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets:The Role of Governance and Finance,Working Paper,George Washington University,World Bank,and University of Maryland.
- [28]黄志勇.研发、FDI和国际贸易对创新能力的影响——基于中国行业数据的实证分析[J].产业经济研究,2013(3):84—90.
- ①可见,每种中间品j的价格和利润是相同的。故下文将中间品标识j省略。
- ②劳动规模越大,使用中间品的规模也就越大,垄断厂商(即中间品厂商)获得的利润也就越高。因此,L在这里用来表示市场规模效应[19]。
- ③由于劳动供给无弹性,根据(7)和(4a)式可知,技术进步率等于经济增长率。